Blog

Posted on

Urgent Warning: The Hidden Danger of Campylobacter That Could Devastate Your Business!

Campylobacter is one of the most prevalent bacterial causes of foodborne illness globally, making it a critical concern for food safety management systems. Understanding this pathogen’s characteristics, transmission routes, and control measures is essential for protecting consumers and maintaining regulatory compliance as a food safety manager.

Microbiological Profile of Campylobacter

The Hidden Danger of Campylobacter That Could Devastate Your Business!
Image credit: tiverylucky via 123rf

Campylobacter is a gram-negative, microaerophilic bacteria with multiple species, though Campylobacter jejuni causes approximately 90% of human campylobacteriosis cases. This pathogen thrives in reduced oxygen environments and has specific growth parameters:

  • Optimal growth temperature: 41-42°C (105-107°F)
  • Growth range: 30-45°C (86-113°F)
  • Cannot multiply below 30°C but remains viable in refrigeration
  • Sensitive to standard cooking temperatures (destroyed at 165°F/74°C)
  • Cannot tolerate drying or freezing well, but survives in water and humid environments

Transmission and High-Risk Foods

Campylobacter’s primary reservoir is the intestinal tract of animals, particularly poultry. For food operations, critical transmission vectors include:

  • Raw and undercooked poultry (particularly chicken)
  • Cross-contamination from raw poultry to ready-to-eat foods
  • Unpasteurized milk and dairy products
  • Contaminated water sources
  • Inadequately cleaned food contact surfaces

Illness Characteristics from Campylobacter

Campylobacteriosis typically manifests 2-5 days after exposure with symptoms including diarrhea (often bloody), abdominal pain, fever, and vomiting. While most cases resolve within a week without treatment, immunocompromised individuals may experience severe illness or complications including Guillain-Barré syndrome in rare cases.

Critical Control Measures

Effective Campylobacter control requires:

  1. Temperature management: Ensure thorough cooking of poultry to at least 165°F (74°C)
  2. Cross-contamination prevention: Implement strict segregation procedures between raw poultry and ready-to-eat foods, including dedicated equipment and work areas
  3. Supplier verification: Establish specifications for incoming poultry products and supplier interventions
  4. Environmental monitoring: Focus on potential harborage sites, particularly in areas where raw poultry is handled
  5. Handwashing protocols: Emphasize hand hygiene after handling raw poultry products
  6. Sanitation validation: Verify sanitizer efficacy against Campylobacter in your cleaning protocols

Implementation in Food Safety Systems

Within your HACCP or food safety plan, Campylobacter control should be addressed through:

  • Specific critical control points for cooking temperatures
  • Prerequisite programs addressing cross-contamination
  • Employee training on the unique risks of this pathogen
  • Verification activities including environmental monitoring

By implementing these targeted controls, food safety managers can significantly reduce Campylobacter risks while maintaining operational efficiency in their establishments.

Posted on

Organic vs Certified Organic: CPFMs Get The Shocking Truth You Need To Know

CFPM Distinction for Certified Organic

As CFPMs, it’s crucial to understand the regulatory differences between certified organic vs. organic products. This distinction impacts compliance, labeling requirements, and consumer trust in your establishment.

Using Organic Products: The Basics

Products marketed as simply “organic” may follow organic farming principles—avoiding synthetic pesticides, fertilizers, GMOs, antibiotics, and growth hormones. However, without certification, there’s no regulatory verification of these practices. This creates a significant gray area for food safety management and supply chain verification.

CFPMs Considering Certified Organic: The Gold Standard

In contrast, “Certified organic” products have undergone rigorous third-party verification to confirm compliance with established organic standards. In the United States, this means meeting the USDA National Organic Program (NOP) requirements. At the same time, other countries maintain their own certification systems, such as EU Organic in Europe or JAS in Japan.

The certification process involves:

  • Complete documentation of farm inputs and practices
  • Regular on-site inspections
  • Soil and product testing
  • Verification of segregation from non-organic products
  • Chain-of-custody documentation throughout production
certified organic vs. organic is important as a CFPM
Image credit: iqoncept via 123rf

Compliance Implications for Certified Food Protection Managers

For CFPMs, these distinctions create different verification requirements:

  1. Supply Chain Verification: Certified organic products have clear tracking, which makes it easier for you to check them.
  2. Labeling Compliance: Only certified organic products may display the USDA Organic seal or equivalent certifications, with strict regulations on how organic claims appear on packaging.
  3. Risk Management: Certified products carry lower compliance risk, as they’ve gone through routine verification that aligns with HACCP and other food safety protocols.
  4. Audit Readiness: During inspections, certified organic documentation provides clear evidence of compliance with organic claims.

Best Practices for Certified Organic vs. Organic

Finally, when incorporating organic products into your operations:

  • Maintain separate storage for certified organic ingredients
  • Document certification status in your authorized supplier program
  • Train staff on the handling requirements for maintaining organic integrity
  • Check certification documents when you receive items.

By understanding these distinctions, certified food protection managers can ensure regulatory compliance and maintain the integrity of organic claims throughout their operations.

Posted on

Recent Surge in Foodborne Illness Outbreaks: A 6-Month Snapshot

Food-borne Illness Outbreaks

In the past six months, the United States has witnessed a troubling increase in foodborne illness outbreaks, raising significant concerns for public health and safety. Understanding these outbreaks is essential for both consumers and food protection managers as they navigate the complexities of food safety.

Notable Foodborne Illness Outbreaks

Recent Surge in Foodborne Illness Outbreaks
Image credit: andreypopov via 123rf

Notable outbreaks have emerged, highlighting the severity of the situation. One significant incident involved a listeria outbreak linked to frozen supplemental shakes served in hospitals and nursing homes, resulting in 12 deaths and 38 infections across 21 states. This outbreak prompted a recall of Lyons ReadyCare and Sysco Imperial Frozen Supplemental Shakes manufactured by Prairie Farms Dairy, emphasizing the need for vigilance in food sourcing and distribution.

Another alarming recall involved over 7 million pounds of deli meats and poultry items from Boar’s Head due to a multistate listeria outbreak. The Maryland Department of Health detected the outbreak strain in a liverwurst sample, underscoring the critical importance of rigorous testing and monitoring in food production.

Additionally, a Salmonella outbreak linked to raw milk products from Raw Farm LLC in Fresno, California, has sickened at least 165 individuals since 2023, extending into 2024. These incidents illustrate the diverse sources of foodborne illnesses and the need for heightened awareness among consumers and producers alike.

Huge Increase in Illnesses

Statistical data reveals a 25% increase in foodborne illnesses in 2024 compared to the previous year, with 1,392 reported cases. Hospitalizations more than doubled, rising from 230 to 487, and deaths increased from 8 to 19. Alarmingly, 98% of these illnesses stemmed from just 13 foodborne illnesses outbreaks, primarily involving Listeria, Salmonella, or E. coli.

Several factors may contribute to this surge in outbreaks, including infrastructural issues, regulatory gaps, and oversight challenges. Inadequate resources and enforcement have delayed responses to contamination incidents, highlighting the need for systemic improvements in food safety regulations.

To mitigate risks, consumers are advised to stay informed about recalls and practice safe food handling and preparation. Food producers should implement stringent safety protocols and regular inspections to ensure compliance with food safety standards. Moreover, there is a pressing need for enhanced regulatory measures and increased funding for food safety oversight agencies to prevent future outbreaks.

In conclusion, the recent surge in foodborne illness outbreaks underscores the importance of vigilance from both consumers and producers in ensuring food safety. Addressing systemic issues in food safety regulations and infrastructure is crucial to mitigating the risk of future outbreaks, ultimately protecting public health and fostering consumer trust in the food supply.

Posted on

Boar’s Head Listeria Crisis: Urgent Recall, Lawsuit Surge, and Factory Shutdown

Boar's Head Listeria Crisis

The recent listeria crisis linked to Boar’s Head products has raised significant concerns within the food safety community, particularly for food protection managers. This outbreak impacted public health. It highlighted the critical importance of stringent food safety protocols in food production facilities.

Listeria Crisis Timeline

The timeline of the outbreak began in mid-2024, when health officials identified a cluster of listeria cases. By the end of the year, reports indicated that 61 individuals had fallen ill. Ten fatalities were attributed to contaminated deli meats. Investigations traced the source of the outbreak to Boar’s Head’s facility in Jarratt, Virginia. The plant was found to have inadequate sanitation practices contributing to the contamination.

Huge Boar’s Head Recall

Boar’s Head Listeria Crisis
Image Credit: surasakib99 via 123rf

Boar’s Head initiated a massive recall of over 7 million pounds of deli meats, including liverwurst, ham, salami, and bologna in response to the outbreak. The Jarratt plant has since been permanently closed. The company announced the discontinuation of liverwurst production altogether. To restore consumer confidence, Boar’s Head has implemented enhanced food safety measures. They also appointed a new chief food safety officer to oversee these initiatives.

Legal repercussions have followed the outbreak, with numerous lawsuits filed by affected consumers and the families of victims. Notably, a $20 million wrongful death lawsuit was filed by Kathleen Hamilton, whose family member succumbed to listeria after consuming the contaminated products. Class-action lawsuits are also underway. This highlights the ongoing legal challenges Boar’s Head faces as it navigates the fallout from this crisis.

The USDA’s investigation revealed prior health violations at the Jarratt plant, raising questions about the effectiveness of regulatory oversight and enforcement actions. This incident underscores the need for a thorough examination of food safety regulations and practices. It also shows the importance of maintaining consumer trust in food products.

As of now, Boar’s Head continues to address the implications of the listeria crisis while working to ensure that such incidents do not recur. For food protection managers, this serves as a critical reminder of the importance of rigorous food safety practices. It underlines the need to stay informed about potential recalls and safety measures. By prioritizing food safety, we can protect public health and foster consumer confidence in our food supply.